Back to news

With so many types of light, why is blue light always considered unhealthy?

Source: 中国之光网 Views: 2676

Source: "Global Science" (ID: huanqiukexue)

Author: Global Science

Written by Li Shiyuan

Proofread | clefable



Image source: Kristopherk/Pixabay


In recent years, "blue light blocking" has appeared more and more frequently in our field of vision. This "blue light anxiety" is somewhat justified, but we should not only focus on blue light.

日出而作,日落而息,这些我们的祖先积累下来的生活经验,已经自然地融入了我们的身体中。和许多生物一样,我们的体内演化出了一套和昼夜交替相吻合的昼夜节律,或者简单来说,我们叫它生物钟。

We often think of circadian rhythm as simply going to bed on time, but in fact besides sleep, human body temperature, cognitive function, and neuroendocrine systems all exhibit rhythms . Aligning internal physiological activities and behavioral rhythms with the periodic changes in the external environment is also known as entrainment . The mechanisms regulating human circadian rhythms are highly complex, and it all begins with light, which is the factor of periodic change we perceive in our environment.


Image source: mohamed_hassan/Pixabay

In ancient times, and even until recently, when night fell, the human world was mostly dark (or at least dim). In recent years, with the increasing popularity of artificial light sources, especially electronic products, the impact of lighting on human circadian rhythms has received growing attention, with blue light being the most frequently mentioned. The wavelength range of visible light for humans is approximately 400–760 nm, among which blue light with shorter wavelengths (approximately 450–485 nm) is often considered to have a negative impact on human sleep rhythms.

However, how do these electromagnetic waves that bring us light regulate our body's rhythms, and how do they significantly affect our circadian rhythms?



Circadian Controller


You might say that light is naturally perceived with the eyes. This answer is half correct—indeed, it involves the eyes, but is not "seeing" in the traditional sense.

The crucial task of light sensing naturally relies on our most important organs, the eyes, particularly the retina at the back of the eyeball. Cone cells and rod cells are the well-known photoreceptor cells; the former detect color and brighter light, while the latter function in dim environments. In addition, the retina contains a third type of photoreceptor cell—the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGCs).

Schematic diagram showing the interconnections among intraretinal ipRGCs, cone cells, and rod cells (see below). R denotes rod cells, C denotes cone cells. (Image source: Weng et al., 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066480)


Unlike the first two types of cells, ipRGCs are non-image-forming cells. They do not enable us to "see" the colorful world but only perceive light intensity. ipRGCs transmit signals via the retinohypothalamic tract (RHT) to the suprachiasmatic nucleus within the hypothalamus.

The suprachiasmatic nucleus is located above the optic chiasm (the X-shaped structure formed by the crossing of the optic nerves from both eyes) and on both sides of the third ventricle, containing approximately 10,000 neurons on each side. Although this tiny structure seems insignificant compared to the 14 billion neurons in the entire brain, it is the command center for our circadian rhythms.


Location of the suprachiasmatic nucleus in the brain. (Image source: Huang Yusan/Wikimedia Commons, License: CC-SA-3.0)

Within the suprachiasmatic nucleus, there exists a molecular feedback loop mechanism that can spontaneously and continuously carry out rhythmic activity, acting as a natural "clock" . Moreover, the suprachiasmatic nucleus coordinates rhythms in areas controlling arousal, sleep, neuroendocrine functions, and the autonomic nervous system by projecting neural signals to these regions via nerve pathways , synchronizing the body's biological clocks. Thus, it acts like a pacemaker for human bodily rhythms , helping our bodies derive a 24-hour rhythm from sunrise and sunset (with slight variations in rhythm cycles among different individuals).


Blue light becomes the main culprit


When discussing the hazards of blue light, we must introduce another major star that often appears alongside sleep issues—melatonin (melatonin). Melatonin is a hormone secreted by the pineal gland in the brain, which can regulate the circadian rhythm. Light exposure inhibits melatonin secretion, a process regulated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Under natural conditions, melatonin secretion in our body begins to increase shortly after sunset, peaks between 2:00 AM and 4:00 AM, and then gradually decreases, showing such periodic changes every day. The periodic variation of melatonin levels in the body is often used as an indicator reflecting the circadian rhythm.


Variations in melatonin levels in the body throughout the day. (Image source: Wahl et al., 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201900102)


For over 20 years, many studies have found that blue light can more effectively suppress melatonin secretion and alter its circadian rhythm compared to longer-wavelength light and mixed white light. As a result, attention has turned to blue light.

It is worth mentioning that scientists at the time believed that only cone cells and rod cells in the human body had photoreceptive functions. However, they found doubts from studies on melatonin. Rod cells are most sensitive to light with a wavelength of about 500 nm, while there are three types of cone cells, which are most sensitive to light with wavelengths of about 430 nm, 530 nm, and 560 nm, respectively. Although the results of these studies varied slightly, they generally found that blue light with a wavelength of 440–480 nm had the most significant effect on circadian rhythms . Such an action spectrum (the curve showing how the efficiency of light-induced physiological or chemical reactions changes with the wavelength of light) did not match the characteristics of the two classic photoreceptor cells.

Thus, scientists hypothesized that other photoreceptive cells or proteins exist in the human body, a notion later confirmed by subsequent discoveries. It turns out that ipRGCs contain a unique melanopsin, which is most sensitive to blue light with a wavelength of approximately 480nm (some studies suggest 460nm). This explains everything, making blue light the primary culprit disrupting our biological clock.


Sensitivity curves of several photopigments to light of different wavelengths. (Image source: Conus et al., 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7040121)



Not just blue light


However, the human body is a highly complex and sophisticated system, and its rhythm regulation mechanisms are no exception. Some studies have found that green and red light with longer wavelengths can also affect human circadian rhythms; while other studies have found that it is not blue light but violet light with shorter wavelengths that has the strongest effect in suppressing melatonin secretion. Moreover, the precision of many studies is not high enough to confirm that melanopsin affects human rhythms by sensing blue light. Therefore, there has been ongoing controversy in the scientific community about blaming blue light.

Scientists believe that, in addition to melanopsin, other components of the photoreceptive system may also be involved in the regulation of circadian rhythm. For example, research evidence indicates that there is communication between rod cells, cone cells, and ipRGCs; ipRGCs may also receive signals from these two types of cells and integrate multiple light signals, thereby responding to visible light of various wavelengths.

A recent study supports this view. Researchers exposed participants' eyes to light pulses of violet (405 nm), blue (470 nm), green (515 nm), and orange (590 nm), finding that except for violet light, which had no effect, the other three types of light significantly suppressed neural activity in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, with no significant differences among their effects .

In addition to spectral characteristics, illuminance and exposure duration also affect the lighting effect . Their impact on circadian rhythm exhibits a dose-response relationship, so we should not focus solely on light of a specific color. A 2015 study found that, compared with reading traditional printed books, people who read on an iPad took longer to fall asleep, had reduced melatonin secretion, and experienced a delayed circadian rhythm. The authors attributed this to the fact that the light emitted by the iPad screen is dominated by short-wavelength light (with a spectral peak at 452 nm in the blue region), whereas the ambient light when reading printed books is white light (with a spectral peak at 612 nm in the orange region).

Image source: stevepb/Pixabay


However, in this widely popular study, the color of light was not the only variable. In fact, the environment in which subjects read printed books was dim, with luminous intensity more than an order of magnitude lower than that of the iPad. Moreover, the proportion of yellow and green light in the light emitted by the iPad was also not low.

Therefore, although many studies support that blue light disrupts human circadian rhythms, this does not mean that only blue light has such an effect, nor does it mean that removing blue light will protect us from the harms of artificial light sources.


Reduce Blue Light Anxiety


Since the research evidence related to is not yet clear , the scientific community remains relatively conservative. The clinical practice guidelines issued by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine state that for individuals with Circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders (CRSWD), it is not recommended to adopt targeted avoidance of certain light exposures as a treatment, including the currently popular blue-light blocking measures, as there is currently insufficient evidence to support these methods.

In the clinical practice guidelines issued by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, targeted avoidance of certain light exposures is not recommended for treating circadian rhythm disorders (highlighted in the red box). (Original image source: Auger et al., 2015. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.5100)


In practice, due to various reasons such as merchant promotions and increased health awareness, the health impacts of blue light have been somewhat exaggerated. For example, regarding the popular anti-blue light glasses in recent years, studies suggest that there is currently no high-quality research evidence supporting the claim that using anti-blue light glasses can improve sleep quality for the general population.

Compared to excessive 'blue light anxiety', scientists believe that a more practical and reliable approach to regulating our biological clock is reducing exposure to bright environments before bedtime, such as minimizing the use of electronic devices and appropriately lowering screen luminance.


Reference link:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2118803119

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0026-z

https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2018.1527773

https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12406

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.016

https://www.jneurosci.org/content/21/16/6405

https://time.com/5752454/blue-light-sleep/

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1418490112

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology9070180

https://dx.doi.org/10.2174%2F1570159X14666161228122115

https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.5100

https://theconversation.com/blue-light-isnt-the-main-source-of-eye-fatigue-and-sleep-loss-its-your-computer-124235


This article is from the WeChat official account "Global Science" (ID: huanqiukexue). For reprint permissions, please contact newmedia@huanqiukexue.com.


Copyright Notice

Articles sourced from China Light are copyrighted. Please cite the source when reposting; otherwise legal responsibility may be pursued.

Reposted articles do not represent China Light’s endorsement of their views or positions.

For copyright, authenticity or other issues, please call 0510-85188298. We will handle them promptly.